"He shook his head suddenly, and peered at Jonas. 'That meant nothing to you, did it?' He asked. Jonas was confused.'I didn't understand it, sir.' 'Of course you didn't. You don't know what snow is, do you?' Jonas shook his head." (Lowry, 78)
No one has memories of the past. No one practically knows anything. Why does there has to be a Reciever that has to hold all of the memories of the past? Why can't everyone have those memories? What's so bad about them?
"The old man wiped his forehead with his sleeve. 'Whew' he said. 'It was exhausting. But you know, even transmitting that tiny memory to you - I think it lightened me just a little.'" (Lowry, 82) I feel sorry for The Giver. He has lots of memories inside of him that it ages him and they weight a lot. Because of this assignment he has growed old and weaker every time. He has lots of memories.
In conclusion, Jonas has been assigned as the Reciever of memory and has finally met the Giver. The Giver has gave Jonas two memories. I really disagree the way they have assigned the Reciever to have all the memories of the past. I think it is very cruel to give so much memories to a person and make them bare those memories until a next Reciever is chosen. I predict that Jonas will have to bare some extremely painful memories but also some other pleasant and beautiful memories.
Dani, after reading your post I was happy and thankful you responded to those two texts because I have the same opinion about them. I couldn´t agree more about the cruelty of the assignment of being the Receiver since he ages very fast and has memories that give him pain and weight him down. Nevertheless, in a society such as this one, having all these memories must be wonderful, since many of them are beautiful. Although, I also feel sorry for the Giver since he has so much weight on his mind. Overall, I share your opinions and you did a good job! Sara
ReplyDeleteThanks Sara!! I am very glad that we both agree!
Delete